Update May 2020: The European Data Protection Board (EDPB) has updated its guidelines specifically related to recommended consent collection mechanisms. More on that here.
When you think about data law and privacy legislations, cookies easily come to mind as they’re directly related to both. This often leads to the common misconception that the Cookie Law (ePrivacy directive) has been repealed by the General Data Protection Regulation (GDPR), which in fact, it has not. Instead, you can think of the ePrivacy Directive and GDPR as working together and complementing each other.
The ePrivacy Directive 2002/58/EC (or Cookie Law) was established to put guidelines in place for the protection of electronic privacy, including email marketing and cookie usage, and it still applies today. As mentioned above, you can think of the ePrivacy Directive as currently “complementing” the GDPR in a sense, rather than being repealed by it.
Generally, directives set certain agreed-upon goals and guidelines in place with Member States being mandated to implement these directives into national legislation. Regulations, on the other hand, are legally binding across all Member States from the moment they are put into effect and they are enforced according to union-wide established rules.
💡 To learn more about which EU cookie consent rules apply on a per-country basis, check out our Cookie Consent Cheatsheet here.
The Cookie Law actually applies not only to cookies but more broadly speaking to any other type of technology that stores or accesses information on a user’s device (e.g. pixels tags, device fingerprinting, unique identifiers, etc.). For simplicity, all such technologies, including cookies, are commonly defined as trackers*.
Moreover, the Cookie Law is, so to speak, technology-neutral, which means that it covers not only website and browser environment but also other types of technology, including apps on smartphones, tablets, smart TVs, or other devices.
*However, in this guide, the terms cookie(s) and tracker(s) will be used interchangeably.
The Cookie Law requires users’ informed consent before storing or accessing information on user’s devices.
The cookie notice must:
Bear in mind that those mentioned above are basic minimum requirements. Cookie banner content requirements may vary from country to country depending on the respective DPA’s views.
First-party cookies are those managed directly by you, the owner of the site/app, on the contrary, third-party cookies are managed by third parties and enable services provided by them. Typically, third-party cookies are present when your site/app uses third-party services to incorporate for example images, social media plugins, or advertising.
In compliance with the general principles of privacy legislation, which prevent the processing before consent, the Cookie Law does not allow the storing of information or the accessing to information stored on user devices before obtaining user consent. In practice, this means that you may have to employ a form of script blocking prior to user consent.
Consent to cookies freely given, specific, informed, and explicit, which means that it must be provided via a clear affirmative (opt-in) action. Therefore, if you use mechanisms such as checkboxes, they must not be pre-checked.
The Working Party document on the Cookie Law states:
To ensure that a consent mechanism for cookies satisfies the conditions in each Member State such consent mechanism should include each of the main elements specific information, prior consent, indication of wishes expressed by user’s active behaviour and an ability to choose freely.
Many EU Data Protection Authorities have released guidance on cookies and similar technologies that include advice and recommendations on valid methods to obtain consent.
The European Data Protection Board (EDPB) has updated their guidelines on consent: Guidelines 05/2020 on consent under Regulation 2016/679. This update is important as it aims to remove any ambiguity on the official position regarding several aspects of cookie usage. Perhaps most significantly, these latest guidelines clearly state that Cookie Walls are prohibited and that the EDPB does not consider consent via scrolling or continued browsing to be valid.
📌To learn more about which EU cookie consent rules apply on a per-country basis, check out our Cookie Consent Cheatsheet here.
Since it is impossible for us to know which specific circumstance applies to your particular case, we do give you the option to easily enable or disable Cookie Solution’s “Consent on continued browsing” features as needed:
In regards to the refusal of consent or opting-out after consent has been given, the law states that users must be “given the possibility” to refuse or withdraw their consent. The Working Party document further elaborates on this point by stating that in regards to withdrawing or refusing consent, you must provide:
This means or mechanism may not have to be hosted directly by you. In some cases under member state law, browser settings are considered to be an acceptable means of withdrawing consent.
The particular consent collection mechanisms considered to be valid may vary by member state
This decision by the Authority is likely deliberate, as to require listing cookies one by one would mean that individual website/app owners would bear the burden of constantly watching over every single third-party cookie, looking for changes that are outside of their control; this would be largely unreasonable, inefficient and likely unhelpful to users.
To further expand on this point, here’s an excerpt from the ICO’s Cookie Guide:
It could be an option to provide long lists of all cookies implemented, but for most users a broader explanation of the way cookies operate and of the categories of cookies used will be helpful. A description of the types of things analytical cookies are used for on the site will be more likely to satisfy the requirements than simply listing all the cookies you use with basic references to their function.
This sentiment is even further elaborated upon by the Italian Data Protection Authority (the Garante Privacy) which expressly states:
There are several reasons why it would appear impossible to require a publisher to provide information on and obtain consent for the installation of cookies on his own website also with regard to those installed by “third parties”.
In the first place, a publisher would be required to always be equipped with the tools and the legal and business skills to take upon himself the obligations of third parties – thus, the publisher would be required to check, from time to time, that what is declared by the third parties corresponds to the purposes they are actually aiming at via their cookies. This is a daunting task because a publisher often has no direct contacts with all the third parties installing cookies via his website, nor does he/she know the logic underlying the respective processing.
Furthermore, it is not seldom the case that licensees step in between a publisher and the said third parties, which makes it ultimately highly difficult for the publisher to keep track of the activities of all the stakeholders.
Secondly, third parties’ cookies might be modified by the third parties with time, and it would prove rather dysfunctional to require publishers to keep track also of these subsequent changes.
Furthermore, one should also consider that publishers – a category including natural persons and SMEs – are often the “weaker” party in this context. Conversely, third parties are usually large companies of substantial economic import that work as a rule with several publishers, so that one publisher may often have to do with a considerable number of third parties.
For all of the above reasons, this DPA is of the opinion that publishers may not be required to include, on the home page of their websites, also the notices relating to the cookies installed by third parties via the publishers’ websites.
You can read more about this here.
The law states that the consent collected must be freely given by the user in order for it to be considered valid. Using coercive methods to obtain consent can make the consent collected invalid. The law does make some concessions (within reason) in cases where the actual ability to provide particular site services is directly affected by the consent or lack thereof.
The Working Party document states:
Websites should not make conditional “general access” to the site on acceptance of all cookies but can only limit certain content if the user does not consent to cookies.
Therefore, while certain content (within legitimate reason) can be restricted based on cookie preferences, users’ ability to generally access your site must not be coerced or conditional upon their consent.
In this respect, bear in mind that, in their guidelines and recommendations, the EDPB, as well as several EU DPAs, have explicitly prohibited the use of the so-called “cookie walls” based on a “take it or leave it approach” that requires users to necessarily provide their consent to access an online service’s content. Cookie walls are considered invalid since the user has no genuine choice.
The Cookie Law envisages two exemptions to the consent requirement, namely:
Example: you use a load balancing cookie to distribute network traffic across different servers. The cookie’s sole purpose is identifying one of the servers (i.e. a communication endpoint) and as such, it falls under the communication exemption.
Example: your e-commerce site uses a session cookie that allows users to “hold” items in their cart while they’re using the site or for the duration of a session. In this scenario, the cookie is necessary for the functioning of the purchasing service that was explicitly requested by the user when they indicate that they would like to add the item to the cart. Similarly, cookies used to remember a user’s language preferences can fall within the necessary exemption.
Are cookies and other trackers used for analytics purposes likely to meet an exemption?
There is not a straight answer. Indeed, EU Data Protection Authorities have different interpretations on this. For example, according to UK ICO’s guidelines the analytics cookies do not fall within the strictly necessary exemption and consequently always require consent. The Belgian and Irish DPAs have similar opinions. On the contrary, in the French, German, Dutch, and Italian DPAs’ views analytics cookies can fall within the strictly necessary exemption in so far as specific circumstances are met (e.g. they are first-party cookies, opt-out are anonymized, cross-tracking is not enabled). To conclude, you should carefully check what rules apply to analytics cookies in your country of reference.
After having shown the cookie banner at the user’s first visit, you don’t have to repeat showing the banner at every visit of that user. However, should consider resurfacing the banner at suitable intervals.
You should also take into consideration that there are a number of reasons and circumstances that may trigger the need to ask visitors to “reconsent” and consequently resurface the banner.
A practical example is when you are using a new non-exempt third-party cookie. In such a situation you will need to obtain fresh consent since the consent previously gathered from the user would apply only to those third-parties that you declared at the original time of collection.
Note that some EU DPAs have specified what can be considered a reasonable period of time for cookie consent validity (for example according to the French DPA, 6 months is considered a reasonable period of time). Our Cookie Solution enables you to easily set this time frame. To learn more about cookie consent validity timelines, see our Cookie Consent Cheatsheet.
While the Cookie Law does not explicitly require that records of consent be kept (just proof) in most cases cookies do process personal data, which is why the record-keeping requirements stemming from the GDPR may apply. Many Data Protection Authorities across the EU have therefore aligned their cookie and tracker rules to GDPR requirements.
Cookie Preference Logs are now available in our Cookie Solution. Simply integrate this feature with one click, and you can easily store and manage GDPR proofs of your users’ consent.
Our comprehensive cookie management solution simplifies compliance with provisions of the EU Cookie Law. As an IAB verified Consent Management Platform (CMP) our Cookie Solution allows you to meet industry standards and pass consent preferences to advertisers in a compliant way.
It allows you to:
Our Cookie Solution adequately informs the user of:
Our solution allows for the acquisition of active consent via:
It gives you further options to:
Easy to run, fast and customizableGenerate a cookie banner